I’ve always read Booman Tribune as having an open-minded and rational approach to looking at this political life of ours. But this entry which broils Hillary Clinton while giving John Edwards the “no problem, pal” is weird. I’m no Clinton supporter, let it be known, but the biggest difference between Clinton and Edwards on Iraq is that she didn’t co-sponsor the IWR.
In the comments section Booman says “Edwards did not tie al-Qaeda to Iraq.”
But he did tie 9/11 to Saddam, which is not so different.
“The path of confronting Saddam is full of hazards. But the path of inaction is far more dangerous. This week, a week where we remember the sacrifice of thousands of innocent Americans made on 9-11, the choice could not be starker. Had we known that such attacks were imminent, we surely would have used every means at our disposal to prevent them and take out the plotters. We cannot wait for such a terrible event — or, if weapons of mass destruction are used, one far worse — to address the clear and present danger posed by Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.”
No Comments
No comments yet.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
